ARCHIVE · 아카이브
EN
-
Two questions I raised in the GA4GH VA-Spec 1.1 ballot review
I followed two VA-Spec 1.1 review questions into the proposed changes and submitted a separate data-contribution guide to the GKM Starter Kit. Both PRs remained open for review.
-
My reproducibility and evaluation maintainer role in Throughline
As Throughline’s Reproducibility & Evaluation Maintainer, I reviewed Pilot 02 and audited its handoff replay in a separate environment. The project accepted Gate B within the frozen test’s…
-
Two reviews passed. The post still sounded wrong.
On September 20, I published a short post about a Jev benchmark. The facts were accurate, but the post read like a validation memo. I had packed in…
-
One missing entry exposed a mismatch in a three-cell rule
Two sets differed by one entry. Recovering it worked, but estimating the difference exposed two pieces of code using different placement rules.
-
Why I changed my Keap1 shortlist
Morroniside looked promising in my preliminary Keap1 calculations. Comparing five compounds under consistent conditions led me to keep catalpol and geniposide for experimental testing.
-
AI summaries need a way back to the source
In Uibang Seongdo, I built a view for comparing prescription records that share a name. That experience informs how I think about AI summaries and the evidence a…